Taraloka declares an ecological emergency

On Tue, 29 October, 2019 - 13:14
Maitridevi's picture

In October 2018 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report stated that without dramatic action we will not be able to limit global warming to a 1.5C increase. They state “Limiting global warming to 1.5°C would require rapid and far-reaching changes… at an unprecedented scale.”

In 2019 the UN Biodiversity report estimated that around one million species “already face extinction, many within decades, more than ever before in human history.”

It is clear from these reports that planet Earth is at present under severe ecological threat.  The community at Taraloka has been discussing how best to respond and act under these circumstances. We have been talking with each other and with our trustees. As Buddhists we have a responsibility to meet the situation with love, awareness, creativity and wisdom, and to alleviate suffering where we can. It is an unprecedented situation and no-one has the answer, but we can seek to make our response adequate to the situation and to our practice of the Dharma.

We are all clear that what Taraloka already offers the world is a precious and significant contribution for these times. However we also feel that further action could be taken. We have therefore decided to declare an ecological emergency and to commit to becoming a zero-carbon centre.

What do we mean by declaring an ecological emergency?

We are saying ecological rather than climate emergency because the problem is wider than just the climate and global warming; and emergency because anything else feels like an understatement of the issues. However declaring an emergency isn’t synonymous with panic and overwhelm, or a collapse into nihilism. Rather we are simply saying that this issue requires urgent attention, clarity and decisive action.

Action necessarily follows from this declaration. We will endeavour to keep the environment in mind whenever we make decisions that impact upon it, and we aim to become carbon-neutral as soon as we are able. We will begin with a review of our carbon footprint and then will work with Amalaketu and others in Triratna to find ways to reduce it. We would like this work to be helpful to any other centres who wish to do the same, so at the same time we will work out a pathway that other Triratna centres can follow.  We hope our actions will encourage retreatants and other sangha members to act themselves wherever they can.

Will it take resources away from the Dharma?

This is not a side-lining of Dharma teaching, or retreats, or meditation practice or Insight. This is about making it clear that the Dharma is relevant to this world and current issues, about explicitly joining up Dharma practice with environmental concerns.  If we don’t do this it’s very possible that in the short term we will lose people and energy.  We will risk being seen as irrelevant by young people and idealists of all ages – some of the very people we’re trying to attract.  In the long-term, this world may lose the freedoms and endowments that make people’s Buddhist practice possible.   

Surely declaring an ecological emergency is rooted in a Dharmic wrong view of trying to ‘fix the world’?

The current existential situation of ecological collapse brings into high relief the Dharmic tension between wisdom and compassion - a tension that is only resolved with deep insight and the arising of the Bodhicitta.  Action around the ecological situation can be rooted in mental states of fear, anger, blame and horrified anxiety.  But it isn’t always, and it doesn’t need to be.  

Focusing solely on teaching and practising the Dharma canbe rooted in mental states of ignoring - not wanting to be fully aware of world issues and the effects of our own actions and inactions. But it isn’t always, and it doesn’t need to be.  Whatever our response is to the ecological situation, as Dharma practitioners we need a focus on the mind as well as our external acts.

The wisdom aspect of the Dharma has a significant contribution to make to any ecological activism.  It brings a sense of spaciousness and perspective, trust in the Dharma beyond space and time, and non-fear.   And an increased awareness of the ecological crisis could contribute significantly to our wisdom practice - to our direct realisations of conditionality and impermanence.

The compassion aspect of the Dharma opens our community up out of any narrow self-absorption in ‘my practice’, ‘my centre’ or ‘my tradition’.  And it means that if there are any compassionate actions we can take - any positive impact we could have - then we take those actions. Why would we not?   

Those of us forming Taraloka right now feel that declaring an ecological emergency, and taking actions that flow from that, is a response that is embedded in both wisdom and compassion.   

A true Dharmic response to the ecological situation could be an intensification of personal practice,  just as much as teaching or working in a centre, just as much as overt social activism. We want to articulate that teaching and practising the Dharma is itself a very effective form of activism.  We also would like to encourage anyone wanting to deepen their Dharma life to follow through on their own ethical sensitivities in response to injustices of any kind – whether in relation to the environment, poverty or discrimination.

The Dharma is for everyone – will this alienate climate sceptics from Centres?

We will alienate people from Centres if we don’t engage with the ecological emergency. We need to have a discussion about appropriate Dharmic responses, and perhaps this will initiate one. Disagreement isn’t the same as disharmony; we don’t all need to agree. Conversely avoiding having the discussion is not harmony – and is perhaps the worst thing we could do. We need to encourage individuals to act based on their ethical sensibilities and not be directive or prescriptive.

Doesn’t our constitution as a registered UK charity prevent us from taking part in political activities?

We understand this to mean involvement in political parties and party campaigning. As Vishvapani said at the ‘Time is Now’ demonstration in London; the air that we breathe, the food that we eat, the ecosystems that support us and the planet that we live on are not political issues, they are existential matters.

In 2025 – looking back – would we regret not doing anything?

This situation is unprecedented; there is no worked-out way to respond. We need to figure it out as we go along and we can modify what we’re doing as we learn. The stakes are very high however.  Throughout its history Buddhists have been concerned with spreading and maintaining the Dharma in this world, but right now it is becoming clear that the continuation of humanity and many other species is now a genuine issue. We need to attend to both Dharma and the world – at root they are not separate.

- Taraloka Buddhist Retreat Centre for Women

Log in or register to take part in this conversation


Saccanama's picture

Sadhu sisters. Very pleased to hear you have taken this step and I will be interested in anything you learn along the way.



Tejopala's picture

Thank you! Very encouraging to see clarity and leadership on this going on in Triratna. 

lokabandhu's picture

This comment has been removed by the person who posted it.

lokabandhu's picture
Thank you Taraloka! May the rest of the Movement follow your lead…
sahajatara's picture

Makes me so happy …Was so disappointing and crushing when the International Council didnt agree to our proposal that we become sustainable movement like the Quakers , perhaps this will create the change that we need in Triratna xxxxxxxxxx Love Sahajatara 

sahajatara's picture

^ just to clarify that I meant we had hoped the IC would recommend it , and help to facilitate the transition , I didnt mean that I hoped it would be forced upon us all from above xxxxxxx

Dayajoti's picture

Fantastic! thanks and love x

Rowan Tilly's picture

Thankyou Taraloka women for stepping into the world from a place of heart and wisdom.  This fills me with joy and inspiration!

Bhante Sangharakshita has advocated civil disobedience for situations such as we now find ourselves.  Some Triratna buddhists are already going forth nonviolently in this way with Extinction Rebellion, myself included (see my talk at the Buddhafield Festival last summer and here

For anyone who cannot take civil disobedience, you might consider supporting those who do take such action by becoming a wellbeing or regenerative culture support person (Extinction Rebellion have such teams).  You could also write to Mark Ovland, an Extinction Rebellion buddhist currently in prison for his nonviolent action (see….  You dont need to agree with what he did; you could simply support his heartful intention and courage.  MARK @ WRITETOMARK.XR [at] PROTONMAIL.COM

Saccanama's picture

Hello Rowan,

do you have the reference for Bhante advocating civil disobedience?



Tejopala's picture

The comments from Bhante about civil disobedience were made in a talk he gave in 1984 called ‘Buddhism, World Peace and Nuclear War.’ At the time Bhante was referring to the existential threat posed by the possibility of nuclear war. It’s very transferable indeed to the current threat to human life and civilisation from the climate and broader ecological crisis, as this now threatens all of life in the same way, with the added problem, unlike the threat of nuclear war, that we only need to carry on as we are in order to come to such an end.

In fact it’s worth listening to his whole talk and imagining that he’s talking about the current crisis as it gives such a clear Dharma-based perspective as to how to respond. 

The relevant section was:

“There are a number of ways in which we can bring pressure on a government to take steps towards the abolition of nuclear weapons, but which ones we adopt will depend on the kind of government with which we are dealing, as well as on the political and cultural history of the country concerned, and even on the psychological make-up of its people. Where parliamentary democracy prevails, and governments are elected by popular vote, it will be possible to bring pressure to bear simply by refusing to vote for any party, or any candidate, not unambiguously committed to working for the total abolition of nuclear weapons. Pressure can also be brought to bear by the persistent lobbying of members of parliament, by the presentation of petitions, by public meetings, marches, and demonstrations, by fasts and solemn vigils - even by `love-ins’ and `be-ins’. By these and similar means the government should be left in no doubt as to what the wishes of the electorate really are. If it remains unresponsive to those wishes, or not sufficiently responsive - and the situation is one of extreme urgency, where every day is precious - then more serious measures should be taken and pressure brought to bear on the government by means of mass civil disobedience along Gandhian lines.

About one thing, however, we must be quite clear. In whatever way pressure is brought on a government to make the abolition of nuclear weapons its top priority, that pressure must be brought non-violently.”

The talk is here:

Saccanama's picture

Great, thanks for that Tejopala. As you say, very relevant and appropriate.



Moksacitta's picture

Thank you Taraloka, this is great!

kamalashila's picture

Well done Maitridevi and Taraloka! I was pleased to see your emphasis on the broader and deep crisis of environmental loss. And I look forward to the main urban centres, such as those in London, following your lead. 

santacitta's picture

Thank you Maitridevi and Taraloka- such fantastic news at such a crucial time, I do hope other centres follow your inspiring lead. 
Thanks also to Rowan and Tejopala for the reference and a reminder of those words from Bhante on non violent civil disobedience. Encouraging, as I am also involved with XR.

Amalaketu's picture

sadhu! So delighted x 

akashadevi's picture

Thank you so much for taking this decisive step! SADHUx3 from Akashadevi

Jnanacandra's picture
Great, dear Taraloka sisters! Very happy to hear that and I found the reasoning in your article very sound in adressing both the wisdom and compassion aspects of our practice and our environmental engagement.
bodhipaksini's picture

Really appreciate you taking this step! Want to voice my support and thanks to you all at Taraloka - for clear thinking and clear action. May you inspire us all to similar. With love.

Vajracaksu's picture

I’m delighted too that one of our major retreat centres in the UK is taking this step. I do hope it’s the beginning of all or most of our retreat centres and public centres following suit, or at the very least becoming carbon neautral. Sadhu Taraloka!

Kind wishes